*[Enwl-eng] Don't play with our safety, NRC
ENWL
enwl.bellona at gmail.com
Sun Jul 12 03:22:03 MSK 2020
Nuclear Information and Resource Service
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) duty is to protect the
health and safety of the American people from an inherently dangerous
industry. But for decades, the NRC has been badly falling down on the job.
The NRC now wants to ax one of its most basic safety
regulations: emergency plans for nuclear disasters. The NRC wants to rewrite
the rules so that certain kinds of new reactors will be exempt from
providing site-specific Emergency Response Plans that must be approved by
the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Instead, the proposal would let
plant owners determine what the size of the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ)
should be—or whether offsite emergency planning is necessary at all.
This proposal would leave the public unprotected in the
case of a large release of radiation. The NRC would let newfangled reactors
that are untested and unproven off the hook and allow plant owners to police
themselves when it comes to safety. When disaster strikes, public officials
and plant operators would have to figure out—on the fly—how to protect
people, who and when to evacuate, how to notify people, how to transport and
shelter them, and more.
The comment period for this terrible idea closes in three
weeks. Tell the NRC: Don’t play with our emergency plans.
Since the Three Mile Island disaster, emergency planning
has been a bedrock of nuclear safety regulation for the last 40 years. It is
the very last line of defense to protect public health and safety when all
else fails. If anything, the nuclear disasters at Fukushima and Chernobyl
prove that the NRC’s emergency planning requirements should be more
stringent, not less.
The NRC seems to think that the small modular reactors and
non-light water reactors covered in their proposal don’t need the same level
of emergency preparedness as their older counterparts. But there’s no reason
to think this. They may be smaller than current reactors, but they would
still contain large amounts of radiological material. And since they are
untested and unproven, they should be at least as tightly regulated as their
older counterparts, if not more so.
With its latest proposal, the NRC is putting the economic
interests of the nuclear industry ahead of the health and safety of the
American people. The comment period for this terrible idea is open right
now. Tell the NRC: Don’t play with our emergency plans.
We need emergency planning for nuclear facilities more
than ever. Climate change is increasing the severity and frequency of
natural disasters that could cause nuclear emergencies, as well as
complicate emergency response plans. But the NRC doesn’t even mention
climate change or extreme weather events in their proposal.
It’s high time the NRC put the health and safety of the
American people above the economic interests of the nuclear industry. The
comment period for this terrible idea closes in three weeks. Tell the NRC:
Don’t play with our emergency plans.
We’ll keep you updated about this and other nuclear policy
developments during the rest of the summer. In the meantime, we hope you’re
staying healthy and safe.
Thanks for your all you do,
The NIRS Team
Diane D'Arrigo
Luis Hestres
Denise Jakobsberg
Tim Judson
Contact Us:
Nuclear Information
and Resource Service
6930 Carroll Ave, Ste. 340
Takoma Park, MD 20912
(301) 270-6477
www.NIRS.org
Connect with Us:
Email Preferences:
From: Nuclear Information and Resource Service
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2020 8:15 PM
Subject: Don't play with our safety, NRC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.enwl.net.ru/pipermail/enwl-eng/attachments/20200712/7b1cd36b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Enwl-eng
mailing list